Sunday, 17 August 2014

White Collar Crimes in New Jersey




Hello Students,

Do you have some assignments that really cause you an headache? Have you completed your research proposal? Do you have busy schedules that do not allow amble time for you to do your homework? It is the time to get relieved from that burden. Open an account through the link http://www.homeworkmarket.com/join/382622 and get all your expectations met. It is a user-friendly website composed of competent writers who are highly qualified. Remember, all you have to do is click this link http://www.homeworkmarket.com/join/382622. I promise it wont hurt you in any way.
It only takes two minutes to open an account.

 White Collar Crime in New Jersey
This paper will investigate a current White Collar Crime that took place in New Jersey. It will document how the incident took place and the reaction of the law enforcers towards it. During July 9th, 2014, three health aides from New Jersey were mentioned in two indictments regarding fraud. Two of the suspects were current employees of Hackensack Company, which is a home based agency that deals in offering medical services to its clients, while the other one was a former employee of the same agency. According to a statement that was released by the State authorities, the three individuals billed Medicaid a total of $73, 000 for services that they had not rendered. The State Attorney General issued a statement that showed that Elhan Gurban, aged 52, allegedly caused a total of 1413 false claims that were submitted to work. During this period, the suspect was out of the country doing other activities that were unrelated to his job obligations. The authorities claimed that the fraud caused Medicaid to pay a total of $64, 125 for services that had not been rendered.
On the other hand, Roman Abashkin, aged 32, allegedly composed 212 false claims to be submitted to work hence causing Medicaid to spend $6, 664 due to the fraud. Moreover, Semen Rybalov, aged 68, went ahead to make 45 false claims costing Medicaid a total of $2, 180. The three men were employed by the Confident Care Corp. that has established its headquarters in New Jersey. They were convicted with three crimes which include; Health Care Fraud, Theft by Deception, and Medicaid Fraud (Friedrichs, 2014). These charges are serious enough to make each of the suspects to serve a period of ten years in jail if found guilty. Westgate (2014) analyzes the main cause of white collar crimes in New Jersey, and within other workplaces around the globe. The first item in his argument is ineffective integrity tests that are subjected to the employees during the time of employment. He argues that employers become deceived that they can be able to learn the character of their employees within few minutes of their interviews. Therefore, when an employee passes the interview, he or she is awarded an opportunity to join the workplace without being subjected to further tests. This aspect makes it hard for them to notice any aspect of malpractice that is being developed by the employees who have been working with them for a long time.
He emphasizes that employees should be subjected through a series of random tests throughout their working period in order to determine the credibility of each of them. Therefore, integrity tests should not be performed during a particular time, but throughout the work experience of the employees. Secondly, the issue of accountability is not well emphasized in most workplaces. The bureaucratic system of management exposes the ordinary employees to little managerial experience hence triggering an attitude of avoiding accountability. They aim at evading being held responsible of the outcome of various activities within their workplaces. They conducted their duties bearing in mind that any blames that would arise in future would be addressed to their managers, and not to them. This aspect makes them reckless in their duties hence triggering development of malpractices in their lines of duty.
Thirdly, lack of close supervision that is triggered by over trustfulness of the employers towards their employees leads to development of unethical practices in the workplaces. After an employee has worked with a particular company for a long time, the employers tend to get convinced that he or she is trustworthy hence failing to monitor closely his or her activities and conduct. The experienced employees take advantage of this trait to start encouraging fraud in order to secure maximum gains from the workplaces. These claims are also supported by Podger (2014) by claiming that employees should be subjected to unconscious tests throughout their working period in order to control any form of malpractice that might arise in their lines of duty. She claims that the tests that are presented during the interviews alert the employees to be very keen in matters concerning their behavior for the sake of winning the employment opportunities. However, after they have been awarded the job, they slowly continue to assume their true natures hence determining the fate of the workplace.
The claims from the three authors can be related to the incident of fraud of Medicaid by three culprits that occurred in New Jersey. Two of the suspects were claimed to have been out of the country when the false claims regarding the health services rendered were being submitted. This aspect implies lack of supervision by their employers. If the employers had paid adequate attention towards determining the whereabouts of all their employees, they would have realized that the two suspects were not within the country during the time of submission of the false claims. Moreover, the aspect of avoidance of accountability is portrayed by the fact that the two suspects had left their nation during the time of submitting the false claims in order to avoid being held accountable in case things went wrong. This trait can be associated with a long term practice that has been going on within the workplace hence leading to embezzling of public funds.
Medicaid also over trusted the Hackensack employees to a point of releasing funds before ascertaining whether the stated health care services had been delivered satisfactorily. It should have established a special department to deal with investigations regarding work execution by their employees in order to make sure that the funds would be released to cater for expenses that resulted to high quality services. The action of Medicaid to release funds after receiving the claims shows that it awards little concern towards determining the quality of services that have been rendered. It implies that the Agency is only interested in seeing the work done regardless of how it has been done. Therefore, laxity of employers regarding matters of supervision of their employees, and how work is being done can be associated with the high cases of white collar crimes that are being experienced.
Conclusion
Gurban, Abashkin and Rybalov were charged with three crimes each which included; Health Care Fraud, theft by deception, and Medicaid Fraud. The three crimes have a magnitude able to see each of the three suspects being sentenced for during of ten years. Despite the fact that the three culprits have being held accountable for their malpractices, their employers should also be answerable for exercising laxity in work. The New Jersey State Authorities established the fact that during the time of the Fraud, two of the suspects were out of the country doing activities that were unrelated to their job. Bearing in mind that their employers were not aware of their whereabouts, it can be argued that their laxity on matters concerning employee supervision led to the malpractices.

No comments:

Post a Comment